🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial action to restrict social networking access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Officials, campaigners, and families are monitoring intently to see if this approach will set a precedent for countries abroad.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing group of nations are moving toward comparable bans.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the leader stating that phones and apps are "taking away our youngsters' innocence". A law may be formalized next year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to verify the age and identity of social media account holders. Authorities have suggested that an similar ban could be "a potential options in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked lawmakers to enact a bill lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a comparable action, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Dutch government has advised families to prevent their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has adopted a symbolic resolution supporting a ban for under-16s unless parental consent is granted. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these platforms, the resolution does not establish mandatory rules.

"A clear age barrier is a good first step," stated the parliamentarian behind the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the government has kept open a future ban, stating that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any action must be "based on robust research".

Previously, momentum gathered behind a bill to impose limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately weakened. However, the government vowed to investigate the issue.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. One foundation founded by the relatives of a girl who died after being exposed to harmful social media material suggests that a blanket age ban might not improve online safety and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the failure of the social media companies to build platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for minors," commented a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A Decentralized Landscape

Across America, legislation is largely occurring at the state level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a law prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a regulation restricting minors to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra access dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced measures demanding guardian approval for teenagers to create social media profiles.

Despite bipartisan support and suggestions from some politicians to follow the Australian path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

International Perspectives

Apart from these regions, other nations are likewise exploring options.

• The Malaysian government intends to ban social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

However, international organizations take a more measured position. Unicef has advised that age-based restrictions carry risks and "could have unintended consequences". The organization highlights that online platforms can be a "critical link" for isolated young people and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve safety.

Even as this worldwide discussion unfolds, the actions of Australia and others indicate that policymakers internationally are no longer content to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.